In the 2008 election campaign, federal party leaders vowed to make the country’s food safer. [More...]

Senior government officials responsible for food safety and inspection have a message: the system has never been better.  [More...]

Canadian Food Inspection Agency documents often painted an inaccurate picture of the conditions at some of Canada’s meat and poultry plants where sanitation problems persisted, an American audit has found.  [More...]

The Agriculture Union – PSAC leveled this charge as the House of Commons Health Committee begins hearings this morning on the implementation of recommendations following Canada’s deadliest food borne illness outbreak.

“Many of the shortcomings that contributed to the Maple Leaf Foods listeriosis disaster two years ago continue to plague the Canadian meat inspection system today,” said Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union – PSAC.

Sheila Weatherill was appointed by the Prime Minister to investigate the outbreak.  Among her 57 recommendations, Weatherill called for an independent audit of the number of inspectors needed to make a new inspection system called the Compliance Verification System, or CVS, work properly.

The federal government claims to have fulfilled this recommendation based on a report it commissioned from PricewaterhouseCoopers .

According to a government prepared summary, PwC concludes that 260 full time inspectors are required to effectively implement CVS, a finding that conveniently confirms the CFIA estimate.

This totally misrepresents the PwC report which clearly states that “This review does not constitute certification or guarantee the accuracy of CFIA’s calculation (of the number of inspectors required to effectively implement CVS).”

Fifteen months after Sheila Weatherill called for an independent resource audit, the government’s own study says the results are not conclusive.

“Effectively, this means that consumers are eating high risk ‘ready to eat’ foods that may not have been adequately inspected, produced in factories that may or may not be meeting safety requirements,” Kingston said.

The Agriculture Union estimates that there were more inspectors working in non-slaughter meat establishments before the Maple Leaf Foods outbreak than the number of inspectors CFIA estimates are required today.  Prior to the outbreak, there were approx. 220 inspectors who devoted the vast majority of their working day to CVS tasks in these meat establishments.  Today, CFIA estimates it needs only 155 FTE inspectors to cover the same territory.  Even adding FTEs for non-CVS work, the total would still fall short of staffing levels before the outbreak.

“The CFIA has yet to explain the number of inspectors it has or needs more than two years after the outbreak.  These numbers truly are inconsistent with all we know and should have raised red flags with CFIA management,” Kingston said.

Sheila Weatherill established several damning facts about the food inspection system in Canada.  She found that:

• The Compliance Verification System (CVS) implemented just before the Maple Leaf Foods outbreak was flawed and in need of “critical improvements related to its design, planning and implementation”.
• CVS was “implemented without a detailed assessment of the resources available to take on these new (CVS) tasks”.
• A shortage of food safety inspectors was in play before the outbreak.

According to an internal CFIA assessment conducted in March and April this year and based on interviews with frontline CFIA inspectors, many of the problems Weatherill identified continue to plague food inspection in Canada.  Among the assessment findings:

• “several participants commented that, in their experience, there was insufficient staff to ensure full delivery of CVS in all plants.” 
• the new inspection system does not allow inspectors enough time to complete verification tasks and lacks effective compliance and enforcement tools when food companies violate safety requirements.
• While some inspectors have access to laptops and high speed internet connections, others “continued to work primarily with pencil and paper”. 
• Inspectors are further hobbled because they do not have direct access to historical information about companies’ food safety records contained in the central CVS database.

“The federal government owes consumers answers about why these problems have been allowed to persist and how the inspection deficit will be addressed,” Kingston said.

-30-

For further information: Jim Thompson 613-447-9592 www.FoodSafetyFirst.ca

The government’s attempt to obscure this conclusion through a quiet release and by misrepresenting the findings of one of three reviews cannot hide the central conclusion that the number of meat inspectors is so inadequate and the workload imposed by a new inspection system (Compliance Verification System or CVS) so great that verification tasks to ensure industry compliance with food safety requirements cannot be completed. 

According to Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union – PSAC which represents federal food inspectors: “effectively, this means that consumers are eating high risk ‘ready to eat’ foods that have not been adequately inspected, produced in factories that may or may not be meeting safety requirements.”

The first of three reports, a Front-Line Assessment of the Implementation of the Compliance Verification System, is based on interviews with 53 front line meat inspectors and supervisors across the country conducted in March and April this year. 

The assessment found that inspectors remain under-trained, lack modern communications equipment, and continue to struggle with an inspection system (CVS) that lacks enforcement teeth, is unrealistic in its design and is applied in a patchwork across the country.

The assessment mirrors the findings of Sheila Weatherill, the investigator appointed by the Prime Minister more than two years ago in the wake of the listeriosis outbreak.

Weatherill concluded that the Compliance Verification System which was implemented just before the outbreak was flawed and in need of “critical improvements related to its design, planning and implementation”.  She also found that the CVS was “implemented without a detailed assessment of the resources available to take on these new (CVS) tasks”, and that a shortage of food safety inspectors was in play before the outbreak.

According to the front-line inspectors interviewed for the assessment:

• “several participants commented that, in their experience, there was insufficient staff to ensure full delivery of CVS in all plants.” 
• the new inspection system does not allow inspectors enough time to complete verification tasks and lacks effective compliance and enforcement tools when food companies violate safety requirements.
• While some inspectors have access to laptops and high speed internet connections, others “continued to work primarily with pencil and paper”. 
• Inspectors are further hobbled because they do not have direct access to historical information about companies’ food safety records contained in the central CVS database.

Training in CVS Inadequate

The assessment identified major gaps in CVS training which is widely acknowledged to be delivered most effectively through a combination of intensive classroom education and mentoring of new staff by experienced inspectors.

Yet, according to the assessment, comprehensive training is impossible to deliver because “the frontline inspection staff complement is not deep enough to regularly free up inspectors for learning and development, as one inspector’s absence must be covered by a colleague”.  The assessment further notes “that the resources required for the mentorship program could not be maintained.”

PriceWaterhouseCoopers Review Misrepresented

The findings of a PwC review have been completely misrepresented by the government.  The government is positioning the PwC report as an independent review of the resources required for CVS.  According to the government prepared summary, PwC concludes that 260 full time inspectors are required to effectively implement CVS, a finding that conveniently confirms the CFIA estimate.

This totally misrepresents the PwC report which clearly states that “This review does not constitute certification or guarantee the accuracy of CFIA’s calculation (of the number of inspectors required to effectively implement CVS).”

Fifteen months after Sheila Weatherill called for an independent review, the government still has not have a third party assessment of the resources required to effectively implement its meat inspection system.

Expert Panel

The third review of CVS is based on the views of two food safety experts: Dr. Ronald Usborne and Dr. Kerri Harris.  Many of their recommendations for improving CVS are in line with the concerns raised by inspectors consulted in the Front-line Assessment.

Meat Inspector hires overstated

Yet again, Minister Ritz overstates the number of meat inspectors his government is funding, claiming in press reports that 170 have been funded since the Weatherill report.  In fact, his own press release from September 11, 2009, announced that only 70 meat inspector job were funded.  Of these, only about 30 new meat inspector positions have been filled to date, a number that has little impact on the ability of meat inspectors to ensure safety.  Subsequent to that announcement, CFIA hired a further 100 slaughter inspectors to meet higher USDA standards, and not to inspect process meat.  

“Clearly, the CFIA remains resource starved and the inspection deficit continues. This is another red flag that the next food borne illness outbreak related to ready to eat meat products could happen at any time because the inspection system is full of holes.  The picture painted in this assessment should make consumers demand immediate action from the federal government to fix this mess before more people suffer needlessly,” Kingston said.

-30-

For more information: Jim Thompson 613-447-9592 www.foodsafetyfirst.ca

The internal assessment found the number of meat inspectors is so inadequate and the workload imposed by a new inspection system (Compliance Verification System or CVS) so great that verification tasks to ensure industry compliance with food safety requirements cannot be completed.  The assessment also found that inspectors remain under-trained, lack modern communications equipment, and continue to struggle with an inspection system (CVS) that lacks enforcement teeth, is unrealistic in its design and is applied in a patchwork across the country.

In addition to the assessment, the government released two other documents which seem designed primarily to obscure the harsh conclusions about the food safety inspection deficit contained in the assessment by frontline inspectors.

“The federal government owes consumers some answers about why these problems have been allowed to persist and how they will be addressed.  Instead, the federal government served up more spin and exaggeration,” said Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union – PSAC, which represents federal food inspectors.

The assessment mirrors the findings of Sheila Weatherill, the investigator appointed by the Prime Minister more than two years ago in the wake of the listeriosis outbreak.

Weatherill reported that the Compliance Verification System which was implemented just before the outbreak was flawed and in need of “critical improvements related to its design, planning and implementation”.  She also found that the CVS was “implemented without a detailed assessment of the resources available to take on these new (CVS) tasks”, and that a shortage of food safety inspectors was in play before the outbreak.

“The CFIA simply does not have the resources it needs to protect Canadians from unsafe food.  Consequently, many of the serious problems Weatherill identified and more remain today,” Kingston said.

The assessment of the CFIA’s meat hygiene program is based on interviews with 53 front line meat inspectors and supervisors across the country conducted in March and April this year, even though Weatherill called for a much more comprehensive audit of the CVS and the resources required to make it work.

According to the assessment, “several participants commented that, in their experience, there was insufficient staff to ensure full delivery of CVS in all plants.”  Assessment participants also report design flaws in CVS: the system does not allow inspectors enough time to complete verification tasks and lacks effective compliance and enforcement tools when food companies violate safety requirements.

For example, under CVS a company can accumulate an unlimited number of Corrective Action Requests, which are issued when an inspector observes a violation of safety requirements, without triggering an in-depth inspection known as a full system audit which would have happened before CVS. 

“Effectively, this means that consumers are eating high risk “ready to eat” foods that have not been adequately inspected, produced in factories that may or may not be meeting safety requirements,” Kingston said.

Since the assessment was completed, CFIA has filled some new process meat inspector positions, often with internal candidates, creating new vacancies within the Agency.

“CFIA is making some progress in growing the process meat inspectorate.  But without action to remedy serious design flaws in CVS, and the training and tools deficit identified in the assessment, only marginal progress will be made toward fixing the problems in the meat hygiene program.  And no progress will be made in the inspection deficit which riddles CFIA’s other programs,” Kingston said.

 The staffing shortage is made worse by the absence of modern tools to allow inspectors to do their work efficiently.  While some inspectors have access to laptops and high speed internet connections, others “continued to work primarily with pencil and paper”.  Inspectors are further hobbled because they do not have direct access to historical information about companies’ food safety records contained in the central CVS database.

“Most inspectors continue to work with stone age tools because CFIA can’t afford to equip them with the basics like cell phones and computers.  Considering the time inspectors are forced to waste travelling to a shared computer and transferring data over dial-up connections, it’s no wonder they can’t complete crucial food safety tasks,” Kingston said.

The assessment identified major gaps in CVS training which is widely acknowledged to be delivered most effectively through a combination of intensive classroom education and mentoring of new staff by experienced inspectors.

Yet, according to the assessment, comprehensive training is impossible to deliver because “the frontline inspection staff complement is not deep enough to regularly free up inspectors for learning and development, as one inspector’s absence must be covered by a colleague”.  The assessment further notes “that the resources required for the mentorship program could not be maintained.”

“Clearly, the CFIA remains resource starved and the inspection deficit continues. This is another red flag that the next food borne illness outbreak related to ready to eat meat products could happen at any time because the inspection system is full of holes.  The picture painted in this assessment should make consumers demand immediate action from the federal government to fix this mess before more people suffer needlessly,” Kingston said.

Also released with the front line assessment of CVS is an expert panel review of CVS technical requirements and a PriceWaterhouseCoopers review of CVS resource requirements.

The government attributes a glowing conclusion to a PriceWaterhouseCoopers “review” of CVS resource requirements that flatly contradicts what is in the PwC report.  Further, the government again overstates the number of meat inspectors that have or will be hired in flagrant conflict with previous government press releases.

“Instead of fixing the inspection deficit, the federal government continues to hide from its responsibility behind a smokescreen of political spin,” Kingston said.

-30-

For information: Jim Thompson 613-447-9592

The Conservative government has played the consumer card over and over since coming to power. Some moves have been significant (drafting modern consumer product safety legislation) while others have been all about the headline (Industry Minister chastising big telcos over text message charges). And it’s not unusual to see the Prime Minister front and centre, big footing over his ministers to make a consumer-oriented announcement, like the Dec. 2007 launch of the Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan or the May 2008 announcement of updated Product of Canada rules so labelling is more accurate.  [More...]

Canadians have been fed a new vocabulary by the federal government: “global synchronized economic downturn,” “recalibration,” and “listeria outbreak.”  [More...]