“We wish Carole well.  She had a tough job to do, made more difficult by chronic under funding, a reality that has prevented the CFIA from implementing all of the recommendations made by Sheila Weatherill to prevent another widespread food borne illness like the Maple Leaf Foods listeriosis outbreak,” said Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union – PSAC which represents federal food inspectors.

Swan was appointed President of the CFIA on June 4, 2007 at the pleasure of the government for a term of five years.

“Appointing a new President of the CFIA will not address the inspector shortage or the other resources challenges that continue to plague the food safety system in Canada.  We hope the new President of the CFIA will make it clear to the government that significant shortcomings in the food safety system in Canada will remain until sufficient safety and inspection resources are invested,” Kingston said.

-30-

For information: Jim Thompson 613-447-9592

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency might be trying hard to protect Canadian consumers from unsafe imported food. But, the simple fact is the agency is too broke to keep such products from store shelves.

Canada’s import food inspection is a patchwork that ignores some products, while others are examined, with little apparent logic to explain why. For Canadians watching daily reports about Germans falling ill and dying from food contaminated with a new variation of the E. coli bacteria, this knowledge will be cold comfort.

Proactive testing and inspection, other than trend monitoring or project work, is beyond the scope of CFIA’s current front line inspection resources. In fact, the inspection of food imports in Canada is one of the weakest components of the CFIA’s work.

There are only a handful of inspectors assigned to imports for food safety purposes. CFIA can afford to only temporarily assign inspectors to monitor imported food products. While one-off projects such as the Food Import Surveillance Team (FIST) are welcome, FIST has a small complement of inspectors and funding is temporary – for one year only.

The only inspectors dedicated to food imports are wholly funded by industry and their purpose is purely commercial, to determine the quality and grade of imported products, and therefore their market value – not to identify threats to public health and safety.

CFIA inspectors are responsible for the inspection of both import and export food products. But inspectors have no latitude when it comes to export products. Where certification is required, a CFIA certificate for food exports is 100-percent mandatory.

When it comes to inspection of food imports, however, the CFIA has wide discretion to allow items onto grocery store shelves uninspected. This creates an impossible balancing act for inspectors and the CFIA who are subject to heavy pressure from the Canadian food industry to certify their shipments for export.

Everyone knows the unofficial priority is export certification.

In the present resource-starved circumstances, CFIA and its inspectors are too often faced with a situation in which the inspection of imported products always takes a back seat to export certifications.

Stopping unsafe food from reaching grocery shelves is not the purpose of import inspection and less than two per cent of food imported into Canada is inspected. And the vast majority of import inspections are conducted to protect plant and animal health, not to protect human health.

Inspections of products intended for human consumption are conducted primarily to monitor trends and not to prevent dangerous goods from reaching store shelves. For example, in the unlikely event that the CFIA inspects a shipment of fresh produce that is observed to be contaminated by an insecticide or fungicide (because it is covered with a coat of white powder, for example), results from laboratory tests would not be available until long after that product had reached the dining room table.

Inspectors and consumers have no way of knowing what treatments have been applied to imported raw products such as fruits and veggies. Importers of raw fruits and vegetables must declare only those treatments required by Canadian import regulations; any other chemical treatments not required to gain access to Canadian consumers do not have to be declared.

Knowing this, CFIA inspectors take appropriate precautions, such as wearing protective clothing and/ or breathing apparatus, when inspecting these kinds of imports because they have no way of knowing what poisonous or dangerous chemicals have been applied to the products they are handling. Unfortunately, downstream food handlers and consumers are unaware that such precautions may be necessary.

CFIA is not able to ensure equivalency with Canadian standards in the food safety systems of countries that export food to Canada. Since 2007, for example, CFIA has not been able to conduct an audit to ensure that food safety systems in China measure up to Canadian standards. To our knowledge, the only foreign country equivalency assessments conducted in 2010 took place in the United States.

But, it’s not just food imports where the CFIA is not able to meet its mandate to safeguard Canadians. Every CFIA program, apart from processed meat inspection, is under tremendous resource pressure. For example, vacant positions in all programs except meat hygiene are not being filled.

Against this backdrop, the government plans to invest with one hand and cut with the other.

In the next two years, the federal government plans to invest an additional $18 million in food safety inspection. At the same time, the controversial program spending review that Ottawa is conducting could end up cutting more than $70 million from the CFIA’s budget.

The CFIA plans to regulate food imports. This is a good idea in principle, but who will enforce the regulations?

So, regulating and licensing food importers may improve appearances only. Meanwhile, our food safety regulator will continue to lack the resources to inspect imported foods, leaving Canadian consumers exposed to potentially dangerous products.

Bob Kingston is president of the Agriculture Union-PSAC which represents federal food inspectors.

© The Ottawa Citizen

Well, maybe not.

According to sources within the CFIA, a secret deal to win mention in the March 2011 budget that will be re-tabled next week may actually result in a cut to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency budget.

The CFIA is said to have made a commitment, no one has publicly disclosed, to cut its own spending by $35 million in exchange for the boost to its food inspection allocation contained in the pre-election budget. 

The problem for food safety is that Flaherty’s plan has only $18 million flowing to the CFIA in the first two years, leaving the Agency in a financial hole in the short term, with the balance apparently coming in 2013 and beyond.

Official spokespeople for CFIA have refused comment on this story citing budget confidentiality.

“If this is true, Finance Minister Flaherty has misrepresented a food inspection budget increase as something much bigger.  And, the CFIA has agreed to a $35 million budget cut in exchange for $18 million and an IOU that may never be honoured given the government’s intention to slash spending,” said Bob Kingston, President of Agriculture Union – PSAC, which represents federal food inspectors.

The upcoming operating and strategic review will require departments and agencies to cut spending by 10% or more which represents $72 million to the CFIA’s budget.  In addition, the CFIA has already had to absorb salary increases from existing budgets which has reduced the Agency’s food safety capacity.

According to the Budget tabled in Parliament on March 22^nd the $100 million investment over five years was to “enable the Government to complete its response to all of the recommendations of the Weatherill Report through targeted investments in inspector training, additional science capacity, and electronic tools to support the work of front-line inspectors”.

“The bad news for consumers is that Ottawa has not come close to fixing the food safety and inspection problems that Sheila Weatherill found at the root of the Maple Leaf deaths.  And, if this behind the scenes deal is true, the CFIA will not be able to.  I hope Minister Flaherty comes clean on June 6^th and comes up with the resources our food safety system so desperately needs,” Kingston said.

-30-

Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More...]

Consumer groups on Friday said Canada’s food inspection agency is making a big mistake by indefinitely suspending inspection activities that were meant to make sure food companies and restaurants don’t mislead consumers with underweight products or exaggerated nutrition claims.  [More...]

In the 2008 election campaign, federal party leaders vowed to make the country’s food safer. [More...]

The 2008 listeria outbreak in Canada caused by Maple Leaf deli meats that killed 23 and sickened 56 was characterized by multiple failures amongst multiple players – primarily Maple Leaf, the Canadian government, and dieticians at assisted-care facilities.  [More...]

The federal government is starting to out food manufacturers that run into serious trouble with its inspectors, Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz said Wednesday. [More...]