By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found. [More…]
By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found. [More…]
By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found.
By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found. [More…]
By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found. [More…]
Canadian Medical Association Journal News Release
The culprits in 2005 were bean sprouts tainted by Salmonella. In 2006, it was Escherichia coli-laced spinach imported from the United States. Two years later, at least 20 Canadians died after eating Ontario-made cold cuts permeated with Listeria monocytogenes. The list of unsafe foods ingested by Canadians goes on and on, which has prompted many health experts to call for the federal government to improve Canada’s food inspection and safety system. [More…]
By Kathy Tomlinson, CBC News
A major western Canadian grocery chain has been selling produce advertised as “B.C. Grown” that came from the United States or elsewhere, CBC News has found. [More…]
Canadian Medical Association Journal News Release
The culprits in 2005 were bean sprouts tainted by Salmonella. In 2006, it was Escherichia coli-laced spinach imported from the United States. Two years later, at least 20 Canadians died after eating Ontario-made cold cuts permeated with Listeria monocytogenes. The list of unsafe foods ingested by Canadians goes on and on, which has prompted many health experts to call for the federal government to improve Canada’s food inspection and safety system. [More…]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CFIA abandons key consumer protections
Ottawa (28 April 2011) The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has abruptly and without explanation cancelled or deferred inspection activity in important areas designed to protect consumers from unsafe food products and fraudulent practices.
According to CFIA documents released this morning by the food inspectors’ union, the CFIA has indefinitely deferred inspection activities related to ensuring that consumer products available in retail outlets are not fraudulently under weight. In addition, sources have revealed that the CFIA has cancelled outright its restaurant menu verification program.
Widespread fraudulent activities related to deliberate mislabeling of products in grocery stores has recently come to light as a result of media investigations, work that should be done by the CFIA. And, new studies have just been published demonstrating that consumers can be fooled by inaccurate and misleading labels into buying products they would not otherwise purchase.
“What would our political leaders say if they became aware that the CFIA is ramping down its consumer protection activities, at the very time when industry practices show clearly consumers need protection?” asked Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union – PSAC, which represents federal food inspectors.
CFIA has gradually been reducing its regulatory oversight activities in the area of consumer protection. According to the documents released this morning, routine CFIA surveillance of the declared weight of products has been “deferred”. This means that any producer or retailer is now free to fraudulently claim that their product weigh s more than it does in fact.
“Just like everywhere else, there are bad apples in the food industry that have demonstrated time and again they cannot be trusted. When the CFIA withdraws from its regulatory oversight responsibilities – as they are now doing — food manufacturers and retailers take advantage, to the detriment of consumers”, said Bob Kingston
In addition, the CFIA has indefinitely cancelled inspection activities related to ensuring that restaurants menus are accurate and not fraudulent descriptions of their offerings. This means that restaurants are now free to make whatever claims they want about the nature of the foods on their menus.
“Claims that menu items are organic, or free of trans fats, or locally produced, can now be made by restaurants safe in the knowledge that no inspector from the CFIA will be checking, unless someone complains,” Kingston said.
“CFIA does not have the resources to fulfill its mandate. As a result, it is dropping activities it considers to be ‘low risk’, all the while hoping that nothing bad happens as a consequence,” Kingston said.
-30-
For information: Jim Thompson 613-9592
Imported & Manufactured Food Program (IMFP)
Annual Memo to Inspectors 2011/2012
Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to highlight to CFIA Inspectors responsible for delivering IMFP work specifications, important changes made to existing work activities and to introduce new activities planned for the 2011/2012 fiscal year.
1. General Updates
This year marks the introduction of a program-wide initiative to promote a distinct and unified IMFP identity through the implementation of standardized work activity documents which utilize common nomenclature, document appearance and organization. All IMFP WSs outlining written work activities will now formally be referred to as Work Specifications (WSs). They will include a new and simplified coding system to facilitate easier identification of each WS. These IMFP WSs fall into one of four categories:
1) Joint WSs, 2) Manufactured Food (MF), 3) Retail Food (RF), 4) Food Safety (FS)
Table 1: 2011/2012 IMFP Work Specifications
| WS Code | Name | Involvement | Former Coding |
| WS_JUIC | Juice and Juice Products | Joint WS
(MF, RF, FS) |
FS312/FS342, |
| WS_CONF | Confectionery | Joint WS
(MF, RF, FS) |
FS510 |
| WS_GRA | Grain-Based Infant & Toddler Foods | Joint WS
(MF, FS) |
WD002 |
| WS_SPIC | Spices | Joint WS
(MF, FS) |
WD001 |
| WS_BLTZ | Border Inspections | Joint WS
(MF, FS) |
WD004 |
| WS_DOMC | Domestic Manufacturer Compliance | Joint WS
(MF, FS) |
0116 |
| WS_IMPC | Import Compliance | Joint WS
(MF, FS) |
WD003, WD004, 0111 |
| WS_OIL | Olive Oil and Expensive Vegetable Oil | MF | 011 A & B |
| WS_RFC | Retail Food Chains | RF | 0121 |
| WS_IFR | Independent, Unaffiliated Food Retailers | RF | 0123 |
| WS_GRND | Ground Meat Inspection | RF | 014F |
| WS_NUT | Nuts, Peanuts, and Peanut Butter | FS | FS403 |
| WS_FFV | Minimally Processed Ready-to-Eat Fresh-Cut Fruit and Vegetables | FS | FS338 |
| WS_SPRO | Sprouted Seeds | FS | FS310 |
| WS_RTEM | Ready to Eat Meat Product | FS | FS328 / FS308 |
| WS_RTEF | Ready-to-Eat Fish | FS | FS330 |
| WS_CHES | Soft and Semi-soft Cheese | FS | FS344 |
| WS_SYR | Tree Syrup and Tree Syrup Products | FS | FS410 |
| WS_SSN | Nutritional Composition of Sole Sources of Nutrition and Pathogens in Powdered Infant Formula | FS | FS508 |
| WS_MILK | Vitamins A and D in Fluid Milk | FS | FS512 |
Note: For all 2011/2012 Work Specifications and until further notice:
i) Net quantity verification activities are deferred, and
ii) Samples will only be taken to support inspection observations where non-compliance is suspected.
1.1 Contact Information
Please note that a new format has been developed for the list of contacts which are normally provided at the end of each WS. The “Contacts” section of each WS will now contain hyperlinks to two contact lists a Specialist Contact List and a Laboratory Contact List, each will bring users to a master document containing all of the required contact information for each individual WS and each FEN0/FS code lab contact, respectively. Storing this information in one central document will facilitate prompt and accurate updates when there is a change.
1.2 References Section
Most of the information which has historically been found within the “References” or “Appendices” sections of each IMFP WS’s, has been collected into one central RDIMS document; now only the link will be provided in each respective WS. This will enable efficient information management of the supplementary information that is provided to inspectors.
1.3 Sampling
For the fiscal year 2011-2012, FEN0 samples will be taken during inspection.
1.3.1 Inspection FEN0 Samples
This year both the WS code (e.g. WS_JUIC) and the SPRINT inspection number should be entered into the comments section of the LSTS form when samples are sent to the CFIA labs for analysis. This will improve our data and reporting capabilities and will enable us to link each LSTS form with a corresponding WS.
All unsatisfactory lab results for samples taken during inspection must now be entered into IMS to enable better tracking of the follow up related to unsatisfactory LSTS results.
2. Joint Work Specifications
2.1 General Notes
To the extent possible, it is recommended that both the MF (labelling) and FS inspections be conducted in each establishment, for each WS. However, it should be noted that a full inspection doesn’t necessarily need to include both an FS and MF components. For example, if an allergen concern is identified for a particular establishment, inspection for allergen and applicable labelling controls should be conducted. However, inspection/sampling for micro would be based on operational priorities.
The coordination of MF and FS inspections will be the responsibility of each inspection office/region as they see fit.
WS inspections will not be conducted in registered facilities by IMFP inspectors.
2.2 Joint WS Details
Juice (WS_JUIC):
This WS is new for 2011/2012 and will involve MF, FS and RF groups. The WS will continue to examine both apple juice and non-alcoholic cider products, but will now be expanded to include other non-federally registered (NFR) juice products, including those made at retail.
It is important to note that this WS will not include frozen novelties, semi-solid products (such as fruit gushers) and candies that contain juice.
This WS will be delivered in three distinct phases: a retail survey, which will be conducted by MF inspectors in Q1of 2011/2012, survey result analysis and associated policy development/clarification in Q2 and the inspection phase will commence in mid-Q2.
Data collected in Q1/Q2 will be shared with the RF and FS groups prior to commencement of their inspection activities in late Q2/Q3.
Table 2: Juice WS Delivery
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |
| Retail Survey
(MF inspectors) |
Analysis of Survey results & policy clarification (HQ/Areas) |
Inspection Phase |
||
Confectionery (WS_CONF):
This WS is new for 2011/2012 and will involve MF, FS and RF groups.
This WS will be delivered in three distinct phases: a retail survey, which will be conducted by MF inspectors in Q1of 2011/2012, survey result analysis and associated policy development/clarification in Q2 and the inspection phase will commence in Q3.
Data collected in Q1/Q2 will be shared with RF and FS prior to commencement of their inspection activities in late Q2/Q3.
This WS is also new for 2011/2012, will have Retail section involvement and will also be delivered in phases: a retail survey will be conducted by MF inspectors in Q1 of 2011/2012, Survey result analysis and associated policy development/clarification will be conducted by HQ/areas in Q2, and the inspection phase will commence in Q3.
Table 3: Confectionery WS Delivery
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| Retail Survey
(MF inspectors) |
Analysis of Survey results & policy clarification (HQ/Areas) |
Inspection Phase |
|
Grain-Based Infant & Toddler Foods (WS_GRA):
The scope of this WS has been expanded to incorporate grain-based foods for young children up to 3 years of age and to examine additional hazards such as undeclared allergens.
It should also be noted that when sampling for mycotoxins, inspectors should limit the products selected to only breakfast-type cereals and infant foods, since snack foods which contain fat may significantly interfere with lab analysis.
Spices (WS_SPIC):
The scope of last year’s WS included only those spices for which a standard existed (FDR Part B, Division 7). This year, the scope has been expanded to incorporate spice blends and seasoning mixes as it was recognized that both labelling and FS issues can exist in these products.
Border Blitz (WS_BLITZ):
This WS was formerly known as the BIPEIV (or WD004). In an attempt to simplify this former work description, the activities have now been split into 2 separate work specifications:
1) Border Inspection activities, which formerly made up the “BI” portion of the BIPEIV, will now be captured under the Border Blitz WS (WS_BLTZ).
2) Post Entry Import Verification activities, which formerly made up the “PEIV” portion of the former BIPEIV work description will now be captured in the Import Compliance WS (WS_IMPC).
Import Compliance (WS_IMPC):
This WS will be used to assess importer’s controls for food safety hazards and labelling and advertising compliance. This WS will serve as a “catch-all”, enabling inspectors to inspect importing establishments that are not captured in a commodity-specific WS.
This WS will involve both MF and FS inspection staff and will incorporate activities from the former Post-Entry Import Verification (PEIV) work description, from MF project 0111, and from the former WD003 – Allergen Controls at Importers.
All MF work conducted in conjunction with this WS should be coded in SPRINT under the 0111 code. However, to enable the collection of inspection data, that is representative of each respective inspection activity, additional and more accurate coding information will be required in SPRINT. Inspectors will now be asked to include the following coding information under the “reason for visit” field:
o “PV” – should be included to capture information for inspection activities that have occurred as a result of information obtained from the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) or an Area Import Centre (activities that would have formerly been done under PEIV) post-entry import verification activities.
o “AL” – should be included to capture Allergen Inspection activities.
o “M” – should be used to capture all other non-compliant inspection activities.
Domestic Manufacturing Compliance (WS_DOMC):
This WS will be used to assess domestic manufacturer’s controls for food safety hazards and labelling and advertising compliance. This WS will serve as the “catch-all”, enabling inspectors to inspect domestic establishments that are not captured in a commodity-specific WS.
2.3 Clarification on coding of WS_DOM and WS_IMP Activities:
Food Safety (FS) – Inspectors are reminded that activities related to food safety complaints, investigations and follow-ups should not be coded as WS’s. These activities should be coded under their appropriate complaint/investigation/follow-up code eg. FS300/301, FS500/501, FS700/701 (or F where applicable).
Manufactured Food (MF) & Retail Food (RF) – Inspectors may code inspection activities related to complaint follow-up as falling under a specific work specification (WS) when a significant amount of the activities required by the WS have been completed in the process of following up on these complaints.
3. Dedicated Work Specifications
3.1 Retail Food Work Specifications
Establishment lists and random selection instructions have now been added to each retail WS, providing retail inspectors with a reference listing of retail establishments which also includes the date of last inspection.
To ensure that information is accurately recorded in SPRINT, more detailed instructions have now been added to each RF WS regarding SPRINT data entry.
In an effort to target high-risk retailers, the percentage of planned (surveillance) inspections has been increased by 25% for WS_RFC and WS_IFR.
3.2 Food Safety Work Specifications
The scope of WS_SYR (or FS410 Maple) has been expanded to include all tree syrup and tree syrup products. This will accommodate the inspection of additional establishments for which lead contamination is of concern.
RDIMS#: 2705766, v5
Document Name : IMFP Annual Memo for Inspectors 2011/2012
Five-year plan calls for inspector training, technological support
The Conservative government pledged Tuesday to boost spending on Canada’s food inspection system by $100 million over the next five years. [More…]
Five-year plan calls for inspector training, technological support
The Conservative government pledged Tuesday to boost spending on Canada’s food inspection system by $100 million over the next five years. [More…]
Five-year plan calls for inspector training, technological support
The Conservative government pledged Tuesday to boost spending on Canada’s food inspection system by $100 million over the next five years. [More…]
Federal election 2011
Ask your candidates take action on food safety
The Canadian Medical Association Journal has issued a stark warning that our food safety system is failing us. They say everything we eat should come with a warning label!
Canada’s food safety system is failing as badly as the Medical Association Journal says because:
- We don’t know where our food comes from – Canada ranks next to last among OECD countries when it comes to traceability – knowing where food originates, how it is processed and what path it takes to the consumer. As the CMAJ editorial says, “Without traceability, it is often impossible to determine where contaminated food originated or where along its route unsafe practices put the public in danger.”
- Industry has too much authority to self-police. Government relies far too much on the food industry to police themselves when it comes to food safety. Cuts to the bone to government inspection have been accompanied by shifting more and more responsibility to the food industry to look after their own food safety programs. Only baby steps have been taken to shore up meat inspection.
- Funding cuts. Just before the election, the Harper government laid out its spending plan that involved a 10% cut to food safety programs while at the same time announcing plans for an inadequate increase in food inspection spending, a half-hearted gesture that died when the election was called.
- Imports are not inspected for consumer safety. Currently, there is next to no inspection to keep unsafe imports off the grocery shelves.
For the federal candidates in your riding, there is no messenger more powerful than you.
Please tell the candidates you need to know if they will work to fix our broken food safety system before you decide how you will be supporting on May 2nd.
Party Positions on Food Safety
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| After reducing the CFIA’s Food Safety and Nutrition Risks spending envelope by $30 million, the government pledged to increase CFIA spending by $18 million in the Federal Budget which died when the election was called. |
“A comprehensive review of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), to ensure Canada’s food safety system is effectively coordinated to minimize risks and assure Canadians that the food on their dinner tables is safe, and An additional $50 million over four years to improve food inspection by the CFIA and to ensure the same food safety standards set for Canadian producers are applied to foods imported into Canada.” |
“We will increase food safety by hiring 200 new food inspectors for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency; We will strengthen the Canada Food Inspection Agency’s capacity to prevent, detect and respond to food borne illness outbreaks and ensure imported foods meet the same environmental and health standards that apply to food produced in Canada;” |
“Amending the Canadian Food Inspection Agency mandate to remove any obligation to promote Canadian agri-business, ensuring the focus is on food safety and food safety only, with enhanced resources for inspection and monitoring.” | A more robust federal food inspection system: 1,000 new jobs, traceability laws and public inspection reports. |
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
Stephen Harper’s strategy on Food Safety:
The Harper government has quietly tabled a plan to cut spending on food safety!
Harper’s plan, contained in the “Main Estimates”, projects a 10% – or $30 million – cut to the Food Safety and Nutrition Risks budget of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the envelope of money CFIA uses to fund food inspection and safety programs, starting next month.
This cut will have devastating consequences to Canada’s food safety program.
Let’s send Stephen Harper a strong message!
Please sign the petition and share it with your friends.
Recent Posts:
[recent posts]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Derek Abma, PostMedia News
Importing food from less developed countries increasingly leads to people literally eating more crap, according to scientists in the United States. [More…]
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
By Sarch Schmidt, PostMedia News
Ottawa (June 1, 2011) – Finance Minister Flaherty’s March 22nd budget included an investment to bolster food inspection of $100 million over five years, right?
Well, maybe not.
According to sources within the CFIA, a secret deal to win mention in the March 2011 budget that will be re-tabled next week may actually result in a cut to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency budget.
The CFIA is said to have made a commitment, no one has publicly disclosed, to cut its own spending by $35 million in exchange for the boost to its food inspection allocation contained in the pre-election budget.
The problem for food safety is that Flaherty’s plan has only $18 million flowing to the CFIA in the first two years, leaving the Agency in a financial hole in the short term, with the balance apparently coming in 2013 and beyond.
Official spokespeople for CFIA have refused comment on this story citing budget confidentiality.
“If this is true, Finance Minister Flaherty has misrepresented a food inspection budget increase as something much bigger. And, the CFIA has agreed to a $35 million budget cut in exchange for $18 million and an IOU that may never be honoured given the government’s intention to slash spending,” said Bob Kingston, President of Agriculture Union – PSAC, which represents federal food inspectors.
The upcoming operating and strategic review will require departments and agencies to cut spending by 10% or more which represents $72 million to the CFIA’s budget. In addition, the CFIA has already had to absorb salary increases from existing budgets which has reduced the Agency’s food safety capacity.
According to the Budget tabled in Parliament on March 22nd the $100 million investment over five years was to “enable the Government to complete its response to all of the recommendations of the Weatherill Report through targeted investments in inspector training, additional science capacity, and electronic tools to support the work of front-line inspectors”.
“The bad news for consumers is that Ottawa has not come close to fixing the food safety and inspection problems that Sheila Weatherill found at the root of the Maple Leaf deaths. And, if this behind the scenes deal is true, the CFIA will not be able to. I hope Minister Flaherty comes clean on June 6th and comes up with the resources our food safety system so desperately needs,” Kingston said.
-30-